MF QueryBoard

I'm planning to buy a house in 10 years and estimate the cost to be around Rs 2.5 to 3 crore. In this regard, what are the best investment options for the home's down payment? - Shreyash Niketan [EasyDNNnews:PaidContentStart]

Considering your intention to purchase a house within the next decade, with an estimated cost ranging between Rs 2.5 to 3 crore, it's crucial to explore the most effective investment avenues for accumulating the down payment. This forward-thinking approach is commendable as it grants you a substantial timeframe to foster your investments, which is fundamental for achieving a respectable rate of return, particularly through equity funds, and ultimately amassing the necessary funds for your down payment. 

However, it's essential to bear in mind that when aiming for a property valued in today's terms, you should factor in real estate inflation to ascertain the target amount you need to secure. 

Once you've accounted for this, you can initiate a Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) in a selection of two to three flexi-cap funds, which should serve as the primary components of your investment portfolio. 

Additionally, you may consider the inclusion of one or two mid and Small-Cap funds to constitute a supplementary allocation, making up no more than 25-30 per cent of your overall portfolio. The precise composition of your portfolio can be tailored to align with your individual risk tolerance and your prior experience in the realm of equity fund investments. 

It's worth noting that investing in real estate, especially in a house of considerable value, represents a concentrated investment, potentially limiting diversification. Additionally, should the need for funds arise, selling the property could prove to be challenging due to its high value, further complicating your financial strategy 

Is it the right time to invest in a corporate bond fund, considering the current market scenario? Can it be my best bet in the longer haul? - Jaideep Pai 

In the current economic climate, corporate bond funds emerge as a prudent investment choice. These funds predominantly allocate 80 per cent of their capital to companies boasting the highest credit ratings, indicating financial stability, a track record of never defaulting, and consistently punctual loan repayments. Nonetheless, there is a slight caveat associated with corporate bond funds. 

They primarily focus on corporate bonds, allocating a smaller proportion to other debt securities. Furthermore, as an investor, it's challenging to gauge the specific maturity of these funds, as some Asset Management Companies (AMCs) manage them with maturities ranging from four to five years or even longer, while others opt for shorter durations or employ a roll-down maturity strategy. 

So, what's the recommended course of action? Opt for a short-duration fund. These funds diversify across various categories of debt assets, offering a broader investment spectrum compared to corporate bond funds. 

Short-duration funds primarily invest in bonds with a Macaulay duration spanning one to three years, rendering their maturity structure relatively predictable. This predictability can aid investors in planning their investments with greater precision. Furthermore, these funds are actively managed but operate within well-defined parameters for both portfolio duration (weighted average) and credit risk adjustments based on the manager's discretion 

Who is entitled to the maturity benefit from a ULIP (Unit Linked Insurance Plan)? Does the ULIP's ultimate payout go to the policyholder or the individual insured under the policy? - Rekha J 

The recipient of the ULIP maturity benefit is typically the policyholder. Let's delve into the details. In insurance, there are usually three distinct parties involved:
1. The Policyholder: This is the individual who purchases the policy, pays the premiums, and is the primary holder of the policy.
2. The Insured: This is the person covered by the policy, whose life or assets are insured under the policy's terms.
3. The Nominee: The nominee is the designated recipient of the policy who benefits in the unfortunate event of the insured individual's demise. 

Within the context of ULIPs, it's important to note that these three roles can be filled by different individuals. To illustrate this, let's consider two scenarios: 

Scenario 1 - Policyholder and Premium Payer are the Same: In this case, let's say a husband acts as the policyholder, purchasing the ULIP policy and paying the premiums. His wife is the insured individual, and their son is designated as the nominee. If the policy matures without any unfortunate events occurring, the maturity benefit, which includes the sum insured and the accumulated investments, is paid to the husband, who is both the policyholder and premium payer 

Scenario 2 - Policyholder and Premium Payer are Different: Building upon the same example, let's suppose the husband remains the policyholder but is not the one paying the premiums; someone else is making the premium payments. Even in this scenario, when the policy reaches maturity, the husband, who is the policyholder, is still the recipient of the maturity benefit. 

However, the policyholder must ensure that all policy documentation is accurate and that premiums are paid punctually to remain eligible for ULIP maturity benefits. 

Why is my investment in gold bonds incurring a loss? I hold GOI Series III SGB 2.50 27/12, and even though gold prices have risen, this gold bond is displaying a negative return. What could be the reason behind this? - Parijat Patil 

Sovereign gold bonds (SGBs) represent a favoured choice for individuals seeking to invest in gold without possessing physical gold. These bonds are obtainable in 1-gram denominations of gold and their multiples. 

The Influence of Liquidity on Sovereign Gold Bond Prices:
The value of sovereign gold bonds is intrinsically linked to the price of gold itself. Consequently, as the price of gold experiences fluctuations, the bond's value follows suit. Nonetheless, the bond's price is further influenced by the level of liquidity in the secondary market, resulting in trading either at a premium or discount. When bonds are in high demand but have limited availability, they tend to trade at a premium. Conversely, bonds characterized by abundant supply and limited demand are more likely to be traded at a discount. 

Opportunities for Investors Arising from Premium and Discount Pricing:
For investors who retain these bonds until maturity, the returns are contingent on variations in the price of gold and the interest accrued on the bonds. However, those inclined to sell their bonds in the secondary market, may encounter situations where the bonds are trading at either a premium or a discount. 

In some instances, even when the price of gold escalates, the bond's price may remain static or even decrease. 

This dynamic sets the stage for investors to consider purchasing bonds that are trading at a discount, potentially leading to higher returns compared to those who initially acquired the bonds upon issuance. On the other hand, bonds trading at a premium may be less enticing to investors. 

In Conclusion:
While the valuation of SGBs mirrors the price of gold, the presence of liquidity in the secondary market can exert a notable impact on the bond's value. Investors can exploit the opportunities stemming from premium and discount pricing in the secondary market. Nonetheless, investors should consider selling their bonds only when they are trading at par or at a premium to optimize their returns.

[EasyDNNnews:PaidContentEnd] [EasyDNNnews:UnPaidContentStart]

[EasyDNNnews:UnPaidContentEnd]