Insider Trader: Secrets,Speculation & SEBI's Crashdown

The phrase that never fails to raise eyebrows on Dalal Street is ‘insider trading’. It evokes boardroom whispers, secret phone calls, and stocks that soar or sink moments before the news breaks. Mandar Wagh unpacks what truly defines insider trading and explores why it continues to resurface despite decades of regulation, SEBI’s stringent actions, persistent loopholes, and the fine line between legal and illegal trades, while highlighting key lessons for investors [EasyDNNnews:PaidContentStart]

The Fine Line Between Smart Insight and Secret Advantage
Every investor dreams of being early, spotting that one piece of news before the rest of the market catches on. That’s what makes markets exciting. Yet, the law draws a strict line between smart research and unlawful advantage. At its core, insider trading refers to buying or selling securities based on material, non-public information that could affect a company’s share price once it becomes public. 

The key words here are material (meaning significant enough to influence investors) and non-public (not yet disclosed to the general market). For instance, if a company executive knows that a major acquisition will be announced tomorrow and decides to buy shares today, that’s insider trading. Take another example. Suppose a promoter of a pharmaceutical company learns, before anyone else, that its new drug has failed a crucial trial and quietly sells his holdings before the news becomes public. That would clearly qualify as insider trading, because the decision is based on confidential information not yet available to other investors. 

The information may be either favourable or adverse for investment, potentially triggering a buy or sell decision. But if you, as an investor, read a credible news report or interpret financial data that’s already public and make a smart bet, that’s perfectly legal. The difference lies in access and timing. 

Who Qualifies as an Insider?
One of the biggest misconceptions is that only top executives or board members can be insiders. The law casts a much wider net. Under the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) definition, an insider is anyone who: 

▪️Has access to unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI). 

▪️Receives such information directly or indirectly from someone who does have such access 

This includes not only directors, key managerial personnel, and auditors but also lawyers, consultants, investment Bankers, and even IT staff who handle confidential data. Sometimes, even a friend or relative who overhears sensitive details at a dinner table can qualify as an insider. 

Consider this example: an employee of a PR firm working on a major merger announcement shares the news with a friend who buys shares before it’s public. Even if the employee never traded personally, both individuals can be held liable for insider trading, one for leaking information and the other for using it. 

A History of Insider Trading in India
Insider trading in India has been a concern since the capital markets began expanding in the late 1980s and 1990s. The Harshad Mehta scam of 1992 highlighted how manipulation and privileged access could distort markets, even though it was not strictly an insider trading case. The scandal exposed loopholes in banking and stock trading systems, prompting stricter regulatory oversight. In the following years, several Indian cases brought insider trading into sharper focus. 

Satyam Scam - The Satyam scam in 2009 involved the company’s founder inflating revenues and profits to mislead investors. It is considered one of India’s biggest corporate accounting frauds, shaking investor confidence in the IT sector. The scam relates to insider trading because some executives and associates allegedly traded shares based on knowledge of the company’s inflated financials before the fraud was publicly exposed. The case reinforced the importance of monitoring trades by those connected to management, auditors, and board members. 

WhatsApp Leaks of Quarterly Results - In 2017, SEBI investigated the circulation of unpublished quarterly financial results of multiple listed companies through WhatsApp groups before official announcements. Although tracing the original source proved challenging, the case led to stricter digital surveillance requirements and mandatory internal controls for companies. 

IndusInd Bank - In May 2025, SEBI issued an interim order against former CEO Sumant Kathpalia, deputy-CEO Arun Khurana and three other senior executives of IndusInd Bank for alleged insider trading. The regulator found that these individuals sold shares while in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information about major accounting discrepancies in the bank’s derivative portfolio. 

These examples show that insider trading is not just a theoretical risk. Even in a regulated market like India, executives, employees, and associates with access to confidential information can influence stock prices and face serious legal consequences. Each case underlines the same lesson: information is power, and misusing that power comes at a cost. 

The Cost of Insider Trading
Insider trading comes with a heavy price, both financial and reputational. Under SEBI’s Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations, offenders may face penalties ranging from ₹10 lakh to ₹25 crore, or three times the profit gained, whichever is higher, along with possible imprisonment under the SEBI Act. Beyond monetary fines, individuals risk career loss, criminal prosecution, and lasting reputational damage. In July 2025, SEBI imposed a penalty of ₹10 lakh on Rupesh Satish Dalal HUF for insider trading in the scrips of HDFC Bank and HDFC Limited ahead of their April 2022 merger announcement. In September 2025, SEBI fined two individuals, Anupam Gupta (₹10 lakh) and Nitin Kumar Garg (₹15 lakh), for insider trading activities in the shares of Nucleus Software Exports Ltd. SEBI found they traded while in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information. 

Why Insider Trading Still Happens
If the risks are so high, why do people still take the chance? The answer lies in human psychology and corporate culture. For some, the temptation to gain quick profits outweighs the fear of getting caught. For others, it’s about ego, a belief that they can outsmart the system. In some cases, insider trading isn’t motivated by greed but by misplaced loyalty, where employees share information to help a friend or family member. 

The availability of fast digital tools, easy cross-border accounts, and messaging platforms has made tracking harder. Moreover, insider trading often involves networks of tippers, tippees, and intermediaries, making it difficult for regulators to establish a clear trail. Despite clear definitions, proving insider trading remains challenging. Insiders exploit multiple loopholes, but SEBI continually evolves strategies and tools to detect and close these gaps. Let’s take a closer look. 

The Grey Areas and Loopholes 

▪️Mosaic theory - It suggests that analysts can piece together small bits of non-material information, such as management tone, supplier hints, or shipment volumes, to form a complete, valuable picture. As long as each piece is obtained legally, it’s allowed. But if even one fragment comes from unpublished, confidential data, the line is crossed. 

▪️Pre-scheduled trading plans - Executives often have set periods during which they can trade shares to avoid accusations of insider trading. However, history has shown that some insiders manipulate these plans, scheduling ‘automatic’ trades conveniently before big announcements. Regulators have tightened monitoring here, but misuse still exists. 

▪️Tip networks and indirect insiders - The use of encrypted messaging apps and temporary data sharing also complicates enforcement. Information often moves from executives to friends, relatives, or consultants, creating a web of indirect insiders. Tippees may claim ignorance, but SEBI holds both tippers and recipients accountable. Expanding the definition of connected persons and imposing stricter penalties has helped regulators close this loophole. 

▪️Cross-border accounts and shell entities - Insiders sometimes use offshore accounts or shell companies to hide their trades. This makes tracing ownership and ultimate beneficiaries difficult, delaying enforcement. 

SEBI and global regulators now focus on beneficial ownership rules, international co-operation, and mandatory disclosure to ensure transparency in crossborder trading. 

▪️Shadow trades executed by third parties - Insiders may use brokers, friends, or algorithmic trading firms to execute trades, making the transactions appear unrelated. Regulators now analyse trading patterns and cross-check human activity to identify suspicious alignments between insiders and executed trades, closing this covert loophole. 

▪️Rumour seeding and market manipulation - Spreading selective rumours can influence stock prices ahead of insider trades. Proving intent is challenging because rumours can appear as opinions. SEBI combats this by monitoring unusual price movements, tracking information sources, and enforcing fast disclosure norms to minimize unfair advantage. 

▪️Selective disclosure to analysts or investors - Companies sometimes share confidential information with a limited group of analysts or investors before public announcements. This creates informational asymmetry. Regulations now require simultaneous disclosures and proper documentation of board meetings to ensure fairness and prevent selective advantage. 

▪️Accounting timing and earnings management - Manipulating the timing of expense recognition or revenue booking can alter reported profits and affect share prices. When insiders trade on these internal adjustments, it constitutes insider trading. Stronger auditing standards, internal controls, and whistleblower channels help mitigate this risk. 

▪️Use of derivatives and structured products - Options, futures, and other derivatives can mask the scale or intent of insider trades. Regulators now monitor derivatives positions closely, requiring disclosures for large or suspicious trades, reducing the risk that insiders profit secretly using complex financial instruments. 

▪️Small, repeated trades to avoid detection - Instead of a single large trade, insiders may execute many small trades across accounts to stay below monitoring thresholds. SEBI uses advanced surveillance systems and pattern recognition algorithms to detect fragmented trades that collectively indicate suspicious activity. 

SEBI’s Insider Watch 

Considering the significant impact of insider trading on markets, investors, and regulators, the SEBI has built a robust regulatory framework to protect investor interests. Over the years, it has continuously strengthened these rules, evolving them to keep pace with changing market dynamics and technological advancements. 

1. Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations, 1992
SEBI introduced the Prohibition of Insider Trading (PIT) Regulations in 1992 to curb the misuse of unpublished price-sensitive information by insiders. These regulations laid the foundation for maintaining market integrity and investor confidence. The 1992 regulations contained gaps that made it challenging to detect and penalize cases of insider trading.

2. Amendments in 2015
In 2015, SEBI overhauled the PIT Regulations to enhance transparency and accountability.
Key provisions included:
▪️Mandatory Disclosure of Trading Plans: Insiders were required to pre-clear their trading activities through structured trading plans.
▪️Enhanced Disclosure Norms: Insiders had to disclose their holdings and trading activities more comprehensively.
▪️Introduction of Structured Digital Databases: Entities were mandated to maintain digital records of UPSI to facilitate surveillance and enforcement. 

3. Amendments in 2019
The 2019 amendments focused on addressing emerging challenges:
▪️Rationalization of 'Connected Person' Definition: SEBI clarified the scope of 'connected persons' to include individuals with a direct or indirect relationship with the company, ensuring broader coverage.
▪️Strengthening Internal Controls: Listed entities were required to implement robust internal controls to prevent leaks of UPSI. 

4. Amendments in 2023 and 2024
Recent amendments have further refined the regulations:
▪️Extension to Mutual Funds: In 2024, SEBI extended the PIT Regulations to include mutual fund units, ensuring uniformity across financial instruments.
▪️Enhanced Surveillance Mechanisms: Continuous monitoring and technology-driven surveillance have been emphasized to detect and prevent insider trading activities. 

The introduction of digital audit trails, mandatory structured databases, and clear communication policies is transforming compliance standards. Going forward, AI-driven surveillance systems are expected to play an even bigger role. Exchanges already monitor unusual price and volume movements in real time, correlating them with corporate events. Additionally, employee awareness programs and ethical training are becoming integral to corporate governance. These regulatory enhancements underscore SEBI's commitment to maintaining a fair and transparent securities market, aligning with global best practices and addressing the evolving landscape of insider trading. 

Clean Trades, Clear Signals: A Guide for Investors 

Not all insider trades are illegal. In fact, insiders trading their own company’s stock is common, provided it follows disclosure norms and happens during open trading windows. Many executives regularly buy or sell shares as part of compensation plans or personal investment strategy. These are known as legitimate insider transactions. In India, they must be disclosed to the stock exchanges within two working days. Transparency is the key difference between lawful insider participation and illegal profit-taking. 

Research shows that legitimate insider buying often signals management’s confidence, while insider selling doesn’t always indicate trouble. For regular investors, understanding insider activity can actually be a smart analytical tool. Disclosures of insider buying or selling patterns can provide clues about management sentiment. However, investors must interpret them cautiously, as context matters. A CEO purchasing shares ahead of a product launch might reflect confidence, but if the same CEO sells after a long rally, it might just be profit booking. 

The key is not to mimic insider moves blindly but to combine them with broader financial analysis. Investors should also be aware of information traps, market rumours or social media posts that claim to have insider information. Acting on such unverified data can land individuals in legal trouble. SEBI has clarified that even if you didn’t originally obtain the UPSI but knowingly used it, you can still be held liable. 

Conclusion
Insider trading is more than just a legal issue. It is a test of integrity, ethics, and market trust. In an era where information moves faster than ever, the temptation to capitalize on confidential knowledge is real. Yet, history and recent cases in India show that crossing the line can be costly. From the Satyam scandal to SEBI’s 2025 actions against traders exploiting unpublished information, the consequences are clear: hefty fines, imprisonment, and lasting reputational damage. Insider trading does not just hurt regulators and companies; it undermines the very fairness that allows investors to compete on equal footing. For investors, there is a subtle distinction to understand. Legal insider activity can provide valuable signals about management confidence. However, interpreting these moves requires context, careful analysis, and caution. Acting on rumours, leaks, or privileged information can quickly turn insight into liability. 

The key takeaway is simple. Markets reward knowledge, but they demand responsibility. Ethical conduct, regulatory awareness, and disciplined analysis ensure that investors benefit from insight without falling into the traps of illegal advantage. In today’s evolving landscape, integrity is not optional; it is essential. And as regulators continue tightening the net, one lesson remains constant. In markets, what you know matters, but how you know it matters even more. 

[EasyDNNnews:PaidContentEnd] [EasyDNNnews:UnPaidContentStart]

[EasyDNNnews:UnPaidContentEnd]